[Cryptech Core] info about commons conservancy

[Stephen Farrell]

Hiya,

On 20/09/18 16:17, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Maybe I am mistaken and most of the core group actually doesn't mind
> associating the project with someone who worked on electronic voting
> systems.

That'd be good to know - I mean if folks generally do/don't
see this as a problem. If they do, then we absolutely do
need to handle that. If not, that's also good input we need.

> Then by all means go ahead with the Commons Conservancy.

Right, so more input is needed.

Note that if folks do additionally agree with Peter about
setting up a GmbH, then it'd be good to know if any of us
are up for doing the work to make that happen. (The biz team
have not discussed that btw, so I don't know if people love
or hate the idea.)

FWIW, I don't personally see a problem with the commons
conservancy.

Cheers,
S.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 6730 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cryptech.is/archives/core/attachments/20180920/945f3a31/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cryptech.is/archives/core/attachments/20180920/945f3a31/attachment-0001.sig>