[Cryptech Tech] Status of RSA timing tests etc

Joachim Strömbergson joachim.strombergson at assured.se
Tue May 29 08:17:43 UTC 2018


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Pavel Shatov wrote:
> Now Paul's idea to run the cores at FMC clock is very interesting,
> and I believe it's viable. It needs a minor bit of investigation with
> a scope, which I'm going to do next week.
> 
> As far as I understand, all the cores we currently have can now run
> at least at 100 MHz, so there should be no problem running them at 90
> MHz, and there's no reason to clock them slower than that.

How about that we do this in two steps:

(1) Increase the sys_clk for the cores to 100 MHz as discussed and
decided on before.

(2) Investigate and try and run the cores synchronously with the 90 MHz.

The point I see by doing this is that if we do (1) and don't see major
performance improvements, we should know a bit more about where the
bottleneck is hiding. Doing (1) should also confirm that we can run the
cores at 90 MHz with no problems. So it would be a bit of a pipe-clean
for (2). (1) _should_be an easy thing to do. Lets not wait anymore.


Pavel, I've asked a few times now, can you please confirm or correct the
suggested changes to the sys_clk clock generator parameters? And is the
changes to those parameters the only place we need to update. No changes
in the ucf-file?

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Assured AB
========================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=3vvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Tech mailing list