[Cryptech Tech] Seeking comments on a proposal for changes to the Cryptech RNG design.

[Joachim Strömbergson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Rob Austein wrote:
> I'm not opposed to the more ambitious options Joachim proposed, just 
> trying to find the right balance.  What I most want out of the 
> proposed revision is the ability to run the FPGA at 100MHz without 
> breaking the good TRNG we already have; if we can get an even better 
> TRNG and free up some resources, cool, but the issue that's really
> in our faces at the moment is the clock speed restriction.

Yes, exactly. I want to minimize the changes. Esp in the short term. And
_only_ change the mixer.

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Assured AB
========================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=D4ks
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----