[Cryptech Tech] why not deterministic ecdsa?
    Leif Johansson 
    leifj at sunet.se
       
    Mon Sep  7 07:29:28 UTC 2015
    
    
  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> 3) Generality and separation of components (someone who uses your
> ecdsa might not necessarily trust your rng).
afaiu this is the usual argument for 6979 but haven't we failed if folks
don't trust our rng?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEUEARECAAYFAlXtPNgACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnf4nwCgsBSJyE6JR02088f6BEEBtadO
CqoAmPmfhcAsBkoAa5JYwfnKSK09wes=
=oJsZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
More information about the Tech
mailing list