[Cryptech Tech] arm

[Basil Dolmatov]

Moreover, handling of bulk data implies, that the source of these data is reliable enough to maintain security chains without any weak points in it.
Otherwise we are repeating the same marketing error "private key is never leaves security device, so it cannot be stolen", but it will sign _any_ data, which will be supplied for signing (including bank transfer of all my funds to arbitrary account ;) ) 

dol@ с iPad

> 11 янв. 2015 г., в 22:02, Basil Dolmatov <dol at reedcat.net> написал(а):
> 
> I am not sure that handling of _bulk_ data should be performed with FPGA only.
> I am sure that this should be performed with hardware and code residing inside security boundary which is not the same, though.
> 
> dol@ с iPad
> 
>> 11 янв. 2015 г., в 21:34, Rob Austein <sra at hactrn.net> написал(а):
>> 
>> At Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:46:03 +0300, Basil Dolmatov wrote:
>>> 
>>> Concerning _operational_tasks_ (not RNG debugging) I wonder why we
>>> need faster interface?
>> 
>> Hashing or encryption of bulk data, for some definition of "bulk".
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tech mailing list
>> Tech at cryptech.is
>> https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech at cryptech.is
> https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech