[Cryptech Tech] arm
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Jan 10 18:13:11 UTC 2015
ok, i guess more perspective is needed for those who were not at this
week's meeting. i am probably the worst person to try to explain this,
but here you go.
o current verilog runs on both xilinx and altera. there is a slight
bias toward altera because the development environment sucks less.
o the development platforms have been the terasic dev board, an even
smaller ds0, and now the novena.
o we figure that a dozen or two folk will try the novena version in a
few months. but it's really a dev environment not for any real use.
having an entire laptop inside the security boundary is a major
tinfoil violation.
o the intent of https://wiki.cryptech.is/wiki/Hardware is not a
product, but rather a small single board alpha prototype that could
actually be tried in an application such as dnssec or rpki signer,
etc.
o we figure maybe O(100) of these alphas might be experimented with by
folk, so we want it to be manufacturable. hence we look toward
asia.
o we wear a lot of tinfoil. this is inside the security boundary,
so we are very wary of extra blobs, code, ... also, due to the
radically open nature of the cryptech effort, it can not have code
with any ipr viruses, gpl3, proprietary, ...
o none of the core team felt confident they could design the board in
a reasonable time, so we are looking for new help. bunnie commented
that board houses tended to specialize in arm cores, so we are
trying to understand.
o joachim has had positive experience with the coretex and mbed, so of
course we are looking at them seriously.
randy
More information about the Tech
mailing list