[Cryptech Tech] EIM Problems

[Leif Johansson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/29/2014 04:14 PM, Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
> Aloha!
> 
> First: Welcome to Cryptech and thank you for helping us. Sorry for
> a late response.
> 
> Paul Shatov wrote:
>> Why is BCLK specified to be 133 MHz in 
>> `core/novena_eim/build/novena_eim.ucf'? Shouldn't BCLK be 
>> constrainted to 100 MHz instead?
> 
> It is a good question. The UCF is directly from the Novena project.
> I assumed that the clocks defined matches the CPU and the board
> design.

Re-reading this thread (as a naive on-looker) I can't figure out what
you guys are saying - if this is a design choice in the novena then
its just a matter of "gilla läget" [1] or am I missing something?

	MVH leifj


[1]
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/swedish_to_english/idioms_maxims_sayings/1790686-gilla_laget.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlSlN0gACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfOXACfe7PtqlV/xlCxOI+C4TX+E7GJ
Pv4AoLh2HIB3Y/eY1OkH5WUHR8sBlcuC
=fc5c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----