[Cryptech Core] nit: reset low or high
Joachim Strömbergson
joachim at secworks.se
Wed Mar 11 09:04:15 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Aloha!
Павел Шатов wrote:
> Yes, different authors have different understanding of reset. This
> may trigger a long dispute of whether you need reset at all, whether
> it should be active-high or active-low, whether it should be sync or
> async, etc. I suggest to just pick a reset strategy and make sure
> that all the code adheres to it, we don't have that much code so far.
> Is it possible to modify Joachim's SHA cores to have active-high
> reset?
We had this discussion before and decided on active low reset. The cores
used to also have asynch reset, but since the cores are primarily for
FPGAs having synch reset is ok.
In this case, Xilinx is doing things a bit differently compared to other
core vendors and tech vendors. As you point out, having no reset is
possible, if we just focus on Xilinx. But for Altera, Actel and for
ASICs that will not work as well.
We can change all other cores, but I'd rather keep the cores active low
and if needed (as in Xilinx) just invert the reset signal before feeding
the CT sub system.
- --
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours
Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
Joachim Strömbergson Secworks AB joachim at secworks.se
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=VAqy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Core
mailing list