[Cryptech Core] lager

[Peter Stuge]

Leif Johansson wrote:
> >>>> and seven million lines of gcc is?
> >>> They are auditable, so yes, potentially transparent.
> >>
> >> and how will we audit seven million lines of code?  and then libc?
> >> and then ...?
> > 
> > This is an excellent case for ongoing peer review.
> 
> Is any of this a reason not to transfer files using btsync?

That might depend on whether those files get reviewed or not, and
any effect file transfer habits might have on development.

If files do get reviewed then I suppose there is less need for an
open file transfer tool, but I am still amazed that this project would
choose to use a closed tool, especially when there are other options,
because "audits are too hard anyway" - really? :)


The point is about processes. I remember discussion about
transparency being what fundamentally supports trust, and that the
project needs to remember to consciously maintain transparency.

I don't see a place for closed tools there.


//Peter