[Cryptech Core] lager

[Leif Johansson]

On 02/23/2015 08:56 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> and seven million lines of gcc is?
>>> They are auditable, so yes, potentially transparent.
>>
>> and how will we audit seven million lines of code?  and then libc?
>> and then ...?
> 
> This is an excellent case for ongoing peer review. I agree that
> after-the-fact audits are difficult, but at the same time I know
> how easy ongoing peer review (of every single commit) is, I've seen
> how it can help very much indeed. It takes time however.
> 
> 
>> look at the sad state of the one serious audit, truecrypt.
> 
> Do you think that the audit is the reason for the sad state?
> 
> 
>> so, potentially cash could fall from the sky.  in the meantime, a few
>> billion are under-fed.
> 
> There are several different compilers and libc implementations
> around, which doesn't just mean one can choose and audit something
> else, but it also enables reliable reproducible builds.
> 
> https://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2014/31c3_-_6240_-_en_-_saal_g_-_201412271400_-_reproducible_builds_-_mike_perry_-_seth_schoen_-_hans_steiner.html

Is any of this a reason not to transfer files using btsync?