[Cryptech Core] draft it-project agreement

[Leif Johansson]

On 2014-05-26 05:40, Randy Bush wrote:
> *much* better

excellent!

> 
>   o 1.1, maybe "hardware/software" as opposed to just "software."

good point

> 
>   o all rights are assigned to nordunet, which then makes them public
>     (cc and bsd).  the ietf way would be for the dev to license to
>     nordunet (but the ipr is not made derivable).  as the ipr is dumped
>     into cc and bsd, i am not sure we care.

exactly

> 
>   o 4.4, why should supplier pay for defending nordunet against possibly
>     frivolous suit?  think nsa (possibly indirect) attack.

I'll talk to the lawyers about that and ask for reasoning - this feels
like a standard clause. There may be good reason.

> 
>   o 7.1, due to funding, i would expect fixed terms and reissue as
>     needed.  nordunet may not want to issue for period longer than bank.
> 

right

> i think we are extremely close.  thank you and ulf, i believe.
> 
> randy
>