[Cryptech Core] Next steps and work packages

[Jakob Schlyter]

On 5 maj 2014, at 10:09, Leif Johansson <leifj at sunet.se> wrote:

> ah too bad - can you elaborate or is it simply not worth the pain?

It could have been how we used ut (for a database backend), but we also got C++ as part of the bargain (and we did not approve). I now see there are pure C implementations, so it might be worth looking at again. I suggest we let it sit at our table for a while, but don't feed it too much suger just yet.

	jakob