[Cryptech Core] core@ vs. tech@ (was git, again)

[Joachim Strömbergson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Linus Nordberg wrote:
> For clarity, core@ has open archives too [0].

Yes, but joining the group restricted.

> I don't understand the separation and don't know what kind of 
> discussions it would make sense to to have on core@ rather than
> tech at .

I would say that non technical discussions for example financing,
meeting preparations etc goes into core. But all technology related goes
into tech. I can see a possible separation into @bugs, @users etc too.
But right now those would be in @tech.

(You were the one pushing for using @tech for as much as possible
something I agree on and try to adhere to.)

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
 Joachim Strömbergson          Secworks AB          joachim at secworks.se
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=hB/h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----