[Cryptech Tech] why not deterministic ecdsa?
    Rob Austein 
    sra at hactrn.net
       
    Sun Sep  6 20:28:53 UTC 2015
    
    
  
At Sun, 06 Sep 2015 22:17:25 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> 
> Am I reading this right that your ECDSA code generated a fresh k
> from your TRNG?
Yes.  Given that we think the TRNG is fairly solid, this is not
particularly expensive.
> You want to read and consider RFC 6979.
Read it a while back.  Haven't seen anything suggesting serious
uptake, but will defer to the usual suspects if they have advice.
    
    
More information about the Tech
mailing list