[Cryptech Tech] goals / use cases
Rob Austein
sra at hactrn.net
Wed Feb 4 17:06:02 UTC 2015
At Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:16:38 -0600, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> since this argument has gone quiet, with no real solid consensus, so
> let me stir the pot :)
>
> my take is that either the fpga or the arm may be poisoned. but the
> arm is more easily poisoned or attacked because it has a full array of
> household appliances and the massive support functions they need.
>
> so i would argue that key gen and store should be in the fpga.
One could argue for a soft core to minimize the number of household
appliances, but at some point one has to pick a trust boundary, and if
anything inside that boundary is poisoned, it's game over.
More information about the Tech
mailing list