[Cryptech Tech] tls prf hsm considerations
Василий Долматов
dol at reedcat.net
Mon Jul 28 07:56:50 UTC 2014
28 июля 2014 г., в 9:13, Leif Johansson <leifj at sunet.se> написал(а):
> On 2014-07-28 07:44, Basil Dolmatov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Отправлено с iPhone
>>
>>> 27 июля 2014 г., в 16:09, Leif Johansson <leifj at sunet.se> написал(а):
>>>
>>>> On 2014-07-26 17:26, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> Or not. The draft was pretty thoroughly thrashed at the last TLS WG
>>>> meeting at IETF 90. It seems predicated on the question "if I want to
>>>> force everyone to do crypto using my limited view of a crypto envelope,
>>>> what changes would I make in TLS".
>>>
>>> Yeah I saw thats what happened. Still can't help thinking that some of
>>> the premise is valid: is there a way for crypto-containers to be less
>>> tied to TLS cipher suites?
>> I'd rather not. ;)
>>>
>
> I'm a big fan of double-negation but... you prefer fewer ties to TLS or
> more ties :-)
Long story, better to tell it f2f ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cryptech.is/archives/tech/attachments/20140728/f68f9cb0/attachment.html>
More information about the Tech
mailing list