[Cryptech Tech] Naming conventions for repos?

[Leif Johansson]

On 2014-02-17 10:01, Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
> Aloha!
>
> (Bikeshed time!)
>
> Does anybody have any good suggestions on how to name repos? I'm
> thinking we should have something like:
I think we should keep it simple and not add naming conventions unless
they add *real* value.
>
> core_xyz - Hardware core for feature xyz. Shared HW functionality would
> be a core too.
>
> sw_xyz - SW implementation of feature xyz. Should libs be sw_something
> too?
>
> system_abc - top level or sub system abc that uses one or more core
> and/or sw components.
>
> tools_foo - Some tool foo developed as part of the project.
>
> docs_deadbeef - Documentation named deadbeef-something (user guide,
> security target) etc for Cryptech. For sw, core and sub(system) related
> documentation I suggest they are placed within the specific repo. For
> example the design specification for core_sha256 would be in doc/ in
> that repo.
>
> Flame on!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech at cryptech.is
> https://cryptech.is/mailman/listinfo/tech


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cryptech.is/pipermail/tech/attachments/20140217/72baaf0e/attachment.html>