[Cryptech Core] info about commons conservancy

[Stephen Farrell]

Hiya,

On 04/10/18 14:25, Peter Stuge wrote:
> 
> But I think it's clear from this thread, from the pad meeting notes,
> and from the lack of a thread back when I originally brought this up
> (when Commons Conservancy was first mentioned) that I am alone with
> my concern about how poorly Commons Conservancy suits CrypTech, 

I think the above is true.

> and
> it seems that a sufficiently large part of this core group fears
> intellectual property problems with a "Radically Open BSD License."

But I don't see how you get to that last conclusion.
However, I suspect we don't need to continue to debate
it, or is there some remaining issue that we need to
tackle before going ahead with the commons conservancy
thing?

Ta,
S.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 6730 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cryptech.is/archives/core/attachments/20181004/edfbbc5f/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cryptech.is/archives/core/attachments/20181004/edfbbc5f/attachment.sig>