[Cryptech Core] Fwd: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: Från BitSim...

[Randy Bush]

>> Latest offer from Bitsim. About 70k still.
>>
> 
> Well, that's strange. STM32F4 is much simpler, than i.MX6Q.
> 
> - lower pin count
> - lower frequency
> - shorter reference manual
> - no need to do DDR3 layout
> - simpler clocking
> - simpler power subsystem
> -
> 
> I believe, they either underestimated i.MX6Q or overestimate STM32F4...

agree.  something does not compute

randy