29 maj 2014 kl. 00:01 skrev "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com>: >> We also touched on 4.4 and the intent is that supplier pays for damages >> directly caused by "malpractice" on the part of supplier. > > this is not a problem (to me). but that is not what the clause says, > is it? > I'll see if we can't make it more clear > randy