[Cryptech-Commits] [sw/stm32] branch python3 updated: One more set of silly Python3 bytes handling errors
git at cryptech.is
git at cryptech.is
Tue Sep 1 14:55:41 UTC 2020
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
sra at hactrn.net pushed a commit to branch python3
in repository sw/stm32.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/python3 by this push:
new 4050df5 One more set of silly Python3 bytes handling errors
4050df5 is described below
commit 4050df583c3221e55e7ada23c211cfc38fae7d89
Author: Rob Austein <sra at hactrn.net>
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 1 10:57:21 2020 -0400
One more set of silly Python3 bytes handling errors
---
bin/dfu | 6 +++---
projects/hsm/cryptech_probe | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/dfu b/bin/dfu
index b3f0be1..fd783e0 100755
--- a/bin/dfu
+++ b/bin/dfu
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ def parse_args():
def _write(dst, data):
for i in range(len(data)):
- dst.write(data[i])
+ dst.write(data[i:i+1])
time.sleep(0.1)
if len(data) == 4:
print("Wrote 0x{}".format(hexlify(data).decode("ascii")))
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def send_file(filename, args):
except serial.SerialException:
time.sleep(0.2)
continue
- dst.write('\r')
+ dst.write(b'\r')
response = _read(dst, args.verbose)
if 'OK' in response:
dst.timeout=2
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ def send_file(filename, args):
if len(ack_bytes) == 4:
break
print('ERROR: Did not receive an ACK, got {!r}'.format(ack_bytes))
- dst.write('\r') # eventually get back to the CLI prompt
+ dst.write(b'\r') # eventually get back to the CLI prompt
ack = struct.unpack('<I', ack_bytes)[0]
if ack != counter + 1:
print('ERROR: Did not receive the expected counter as ACK (got {!r}/{!r}, not {!r})'.format(ack, ack_bytes, counter))
diff --git a/projects/hsm/cryptech_probe b/projects/hsm/cryptech_probe
index 7c26bf4..84359b7 100755
--- a/projects/hsm/cryptech_probe
+++ b/projects/hsm/cryptech_probe
@@ -102,8 +102,12 @@ for port in ports:
except serial.SerialException:
time.sleep(0.2)
- for c in probe_string:
- tty.write(c)
+ # Not sure we really need to dribble the probe string out this slowly anymore,
+ # but once upon a time we did this for a reason and it's not like this program
+ # is a performance bottleneck, so stick with the safe version.
+
+ for i in range(len(probe_string)):
+ tty.write(probe_string[i:i+1])
time.sleep(0.1)
response = tty.read(args.read_buffer_size)
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
More information about the Commits
mailing list